What are the Challenges and considerations when Adopting Serverless Architecture?

Considerations For Adopting Serverless Architecture

This post may contain affiliate links which means I may receive a commission. Learn more on my Privacy Policy page.

Considerations For Adopting Serverless Architecture

Serverless architecture represents an innovative alternative for Web and Application Developers. By abstracting away infrastructure, language runtimes, and additional services – including security – Serverless architecture removes the burden of manual deployment and management in production environments.

Functions that are temporary make it harder for adversaries to access sensitive data or conduct lateral moves. Furthermore, serverless workloads generate logs which aid in root cause analysis in case of issues.


Serverless architecture allows Development teams to release new features quickly by cutting engineering work on infrastructure code and automating application scalability, saving on operational costs by only paying for what they use.

However, one major challenge associated with serverless is its complexity – making it challenging for developers to monitor and debug apps real time due to how serverless functions interact with other services and infrastructure components via API calls.

Even though many teams now employ fewer sysadmins, this does not relieve them of responsibility for monitoring, architectural scaling and security issues. Therefore, teams should create a strong culture of DevOps, including creating close bonds between developers and technical operations personnel.


Establishing a solid foundation when moving to serverless architecture is one of the primary challenges associated with migrating to this form of computing, which requires knowledge of infrastructure technologies as well as creating microservices with ease and creating strategies for upgrading functions without redeployment.

Lack of standard practices when it comes to developing serverless apps presents another hurdle, leading to architectural variation between projects. Furthermore, transient connections between functions and databases may result in data leakage or exhausting database connection pools – all risks which must be managed when dealing with serverless technology.

Serverless apps must also be designed to be resistant to failures and traffic fluctuations, using techniques like circuit-breaker patterns for failing functions, routing requests to alternative services and managing inter-service dependencies – this enables faster deployments with reduced dependencies on DevOps/SRE teams.


While serverless architecture provides many advantages, it also poses some challenges. One such difficulty is scaling. Serverless apps require various managed cloud services – API Gateway for HTTP requests, Lambda functions to process those requests and DynamoDB for data storage – from which serverless applications run. Cloud vendors take care of providing all these infrastructure needs; scaling as necessary while billing only for actual execution time.

Another challenge associated with serverless apps development is the absence of standard practices and dominant application-level frameworks that ensure consistent end-to-end development processes, leading to significant variation between client projects if multiple programming languages are used by teams working on them; this often results in delays when functions are first invoked, known as cold starts, which negatively impacts scalability and cost.


Security should always be at the forefront of those considering adopting serverless architecture. Misconfigurations can create serious vulnerabilities and threats, while limited visibility makes it hard for DevSecOps teams to make sense of all of the data generated by serverless architectures.

Third-party dependencies can contain malware or backdoors that allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to functions and applications. Lack of control over these components may also result in data breaches or reputational damage.

Security in serverless architecture can be improved by employing least privilege access control models and secure communication among services, while developers should employ secure coding practices in order to reduce vulnerability against common attacks. Geographic considerations must also be taken into account as time zone errors could pose issues during deployments.


Traditional development teams were responsible for managing servers and backend processes, which took away focus and wasted valuable time. Now with serverless architecture, this burden has been removed so teams can focus on developing app code instead.

Serverless infrastructures consist of a collection of managed services from different cloud vendors. For example, this could include receiving network requests, computing platforms that run code and store and retrieve it automatically, fully managed datastores which store and retrieve information and so forth.

Due to their disparate components, it can be challenging to quickly detect issues and identify root causes within an acceptable timeframe. That is why third-party tools like Dashbird or Thundra provide solutions by automating visualization, setting alerts and providing insight into the health of an application.